Answer a few quick questions to receive tailored risk zone suggestions aligned with your product's focus and industry.
* Your data will be securely stored and will not be shared without your consent.
What is PII?
Any data that can directly or indirectly identify an individual, including but not limited to: - Names (first, last, or full)- Email addresses- Phone numbers- Social Security Numbers- IP addresses- Biometric data (e.g., fingerprints, facial recognition)- Financial data (e.g., credit card numbers, bank details)- Sensitive personal information (e.g., health data)
Why important?
This question assesses whether your system gathers sensitive data and ensures compliance with privacy laws like GDPR or CCPA. Transparently addressing this builds trust by demonstrating that you are mindful of user data handling practices.
Your business domain helps us provide recommendations tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of your industry.
Understanding the dataset’s license ensures legal compliance and proper usage rights. Different licenses govern sharing, modifications, and commercial use.
This helps us identify the most relevant transparency sections for your AI system, ensuring the recommendations align with its primary use.
Understanding your product's intended use case helps us identify the most relevant transparency recommendations tailored to its purpose. This ensures your report aligns with your product's goals and user needs.
Your primary audience defines the level of safeguards, disclosures, and ethical considerations needed to build trust and meet user expectations.
Start with the most risky areas for your business domain and audience to get your AI system assessment.
Estimated time: 30 minutes
We recommend focusing on Training Data, Privacy, and Reliability first, as these areas carry the highest risks for your business and have the greatest impact on building investor trust, compliance, and responsible AI practices.
Focusing on these areas first ensures your transparency report has the most relevant assessment on your current AI system and proactices, and tackles the most pressing risks with actionalbe suggestions.
A clear and consistent dataset name ensures traceability, documentation, and reference for compliance, reproducibility, and governance. Without a proper name, tracking dataset versions and sources can become difficult.
Ownership defines data rights, access permissions, and legal responsibilities for use, modification, and sharing. Unclear ownership can lead to legal risks or unauthorized data use.
A dataset description helps users understand its contents, purpose, and intended applications. Without context, the dataset’s relevance and limitations may not be clear.
Dataset size impacts storage, processing power, and model training efficiency. Larger datasets may introduce higher costs and computational challenges.
Categorizing datasets helps ensure proper data handling, licensing, and processing methods. Different categories (e.g., text vs. video) require different storage, labeling, and compliance considerations.
A precise license name (e.g., GPL, Apache, Creative Commons) defines terms of use, attribution requirements, and modification permissions. Without this, organizations risk non-compliance and legal disputes.
The collection period affects data relevance, accuracy, and compliance with laws like GDPR (which requires data minimization). Outdated data may introduce biases or inaccuracies.
Usage periods define how long data remains valid and when it must be re-evaluated or retired. Data stored indefinitely without reassessment may become obsolete or non-compliant.
PII introduces privacy risks and legal responsibilities under regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA. Mishandling PII can lead to data breaches, compliance violations, and legal penalties.
Many privacy laws require explicit opt-in consent before collecting or processing PII. Using personal data without consent can lead to legal liability and reputational harm.
Different license agreements (e.g., EULA, Terms of Service, Privacy Policy) dictate how personal data can be used, stored, and shared. Without proper licensing, organizations may risk privacy law violations.
Anonymization reduces privacy risks and regulatory burdens while still allowing data utility. Failing to anonymize PII can lead to GDPR, CCPA, or HIPAA violations.
Using copyrighted data without proper licensing or permissions can lead to intellectual property disputes and legal consequences. Fair use claims must be carefully justified.
The specific license (e.g., Fair Use, Commercial License, Creative Commons) dictates how copyrighted content can be used, shared, or modified. Unauthorized use can lead to legal penalties.
Synthetic data can help reduce privacy risks and mitigate biases, but it must be clearly identified to ensure proper model evaluation and risk assessment.
Collecting PII impacts privacy, security, and regulatory compliance. If mishandled, it can lead to legal penalties, financial losses, and user distrust. Regulations such as GDPR (EU), CCPA (California), and COPPA (for minors' data in the U.S.) impose strict requirements on how PII is stored, processed, and shared. Improper handling can result in severe legal and financial consequences, as well as loss of consumer trust if a data breach occurs.
Categorizing data helps define the necessary security measures and ensures compliance with different legal requirements. For instance, sensitive data like health records (HIPAA), financial data (PCI-DSS), and business-confidential information require higher security standards than aggregated or publicly available data. Over-collecting data without a clear purpose can increase the risk of breaches, unauthorized access, or non-compliance with data minimization principles.
Data usage must be transparent to ensure compliance and maintain user trust. If data is used for model training, analytics, or shared externally, users need to be informed. Undisclosed data usage—especially if shared with third parties without consent—can result in loss of trust, legal challenges, and reputational damage.
Encryption and role-based access control are critical in protecting user data. Failure to secure data properly can lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, and legal liabilities. Organizations that do not implement adequate security measures risk violating laws such as GDPR and CCPA.
Using customer data for AI training raises concerns around privacy, consent, and ethical AI development. If raw, identifiable data is used without user consent, this can violate data protection laws (GDPR, CCPA) and increase the risk of unintended bias in AI models.
Sharing customer data with third parties introduces additional security and compliance risks, requiring robust contractual agreements (DPAs), encryption, and strict access controls. If sensitive or personal data is shared without proper anonymization, it may be misused, exposed in breaches, or accessed by unauthorized entities, leading to legal liability and reputational harm.
Security breaches can lead to financial loss, reputational damage, and legal consequences. Organizations must proactively prevent unauthorized access and data leaks. Without proper safeguards, AI systems are vulnerable to data exfiltration, cyberattacks, and insider threats.
User control over personal data is required under regulations like GDPR and CCPA. Lack of transparency or limited data access for users can lead to non-compliance penalties and loss of trust. Users need the ability to view, modify, and delete their data.
Large AI models often inherit biases from the data they are trained on, which can affect accuracy, fairness, and ethical considerations. If left unaddressed, these biases can perpetuate unfair or incorrect outcomes.
Bias can arise from multiple sources, including data collection, algorithmic processing, and user interactions. Identifying these biases ensures that the AI system is fair and reliable for all users. Ignoring application-specific biases may lead to discriminatory results or unintended harm.
Addressing bias is a crucial step in ensuring AI fairness and trustworthiness. If no mitigation steps are taken, the AI system may reinforce harmful stereotypes or exhibit skewed behavior that disadvantages certain groups.
AI-generated content can be mistaken for authentic media, potentially leading to misinformation, fraud, or ethical concerns. Transparency is crucial to maintaining trust and preventing misuse.
Labeling AI-generated content ensures users can distinguish between synthetic and authentic material, reducing the risk of misinformation and ethical concerns. Without proper labeling, AI-generated content could be misused for deceptive purposes.
Users need clear and accessible information about AI-generated content to ensure transparency and prevent misunderstandings. Omission of disclaimers can lead to trust issues and potential regulatory challenges.
Collecting minors' data carries legal and ethical responsibilities. Improper handling can violate privacy laws such as COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, US) and GDPR-K (General Data Protection Regulation for Kids, EU), leading to legal penalties and reputational damage.
Understanding what data is collected helps clarify security requirements, compliance obligations, and potential privacy risks. Over-collection increases legal exposure and the risk of data breaches.
Data breaches involving minors’ information can result in severe legal and reputational consequences. Encrypting data and limiting access ensures compliance with privacy laws.
Transparency about data usage ensures user trust, regulatory compliance, and ethical data handling. Users need to know if their data is used for model improvement, analytics, customer insights, or shared with third parties. Unclear data policies can lead to privacy violations, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.
Using customer data for AI training affects privacy, security, and compliance. Unauthorized data use can violate regulations like GDPR and CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act).
A multi-layered security approach (policy-based restrictions, penetration testing, and real-time monitoring) reduces breach risks and ensures regulatory compliance. Lack of proactive security measures increases the risk of data breaches, financial loss, and regulatory penalties. Without an incident response plan, organizations may struggle to contain and mitigate breaches effectively.
Giving parents access to review and delete their child’s data aligns with COPPA and GDPR-K, ensuring compliance and reinforcing user trust. If data deletion is only available through slow, manual processes, it can lead to regulatory violations, parental complaints, and potential fines.
AI systems interacting with minors must have strict content safeguards to prevent exposure to harmful, offensive, or misleading information. Relying on basic profanity filters is not enough, as AI can generate inappropriate content in more subtle ways.
AI risks evolve over time. Without ongoing safety testing and monitoring, new vulnerabilities or harmful behaviors may go undetected, exposing minors to inappropriate content.
Clearly defined accountability ensures compliance with child protection laws and ethical guidelines. Without a responsible team or committee, child safety concerns may be overlooked or handled inconsistently.
AI can sometimes generate unintended or harmful outputs, making a structured response process essential. A delayed or unstructured response can expose minors to risks, damage trust, and lead to legal consequences.
Children require special ethical considerations that general AI governance frameworks may not fully address. Without child-specific governance, AI systems may overlook critical risks or fail to comply with child protection laws.
Following established Responsible AI (RAI) frameworks demonstrates a commitment to ethical AI development, governance, and accountability. Alignment with these guidelines helps organizations maintain trust, regulatory compliance, and industry best practices. Without adherence to a framework, AI governance may lack transparency and rigor.
